Saturday, April 21, 2018

Roman concrete, for durable, eco-friendly construction – applications for tidal power generation, and protection against sea level rise.

The following was published in the journal Science Progress recently, of which I am an editor. Since this blog typically covers issues of environment and energy, I am including the present topic, which I hope will be of interest to its regular readers, and indeed to anyone else with sympathies in the direction of sustainability.


Introduction and Overview.
A recent study has provided further insight into the cause of the remarkable durability of Roman concrete1. As is stressed in the paper1, the Ancient Romans were well aware of the robustness of their concrete, which they named opus caementicium: thus, Pliny the Elder recorded in his Naturalis Historia, “that as soon as it comes into contact with the waves of the sea and is submerged becomes a single stone mass (fierem unum lapidem), impregnable to the waves and every day stronger”; while the Roman engineer and architect,  Vitruvius, wrote in the first century BCE of “a kind of powdery earth (pulvis) that by its nature produces wonderful results”, and that when “...pumiceous ash (pulvis), lime (calx), and tuff (tofus) ...are brought together in one mixture, and suddenly they are put into contact with [sea-] water, they cohere into a single mass, quickly solidifying, hardened by the moisture, and neither the effect of the waves nor the effect of water can dissolve them.”


The fact that some of their marine structures (Figure 1), including seawalls and harbour piers, still remain standing, and in good condition after 2,000 years, attests to the remarkable strength of Roman concrete, which might be used for the construction of seawalls, and for such tidal electricity generation facilities as the proposed Swansea Bay tidal lagoon power station2, rather than the kinds of concrete that are now typically employed, which are eroded by the impact of the waves over far shorter periods of time. It is clear that the Romans exercised a considerable amount of effort and ingenuity in arriving at the correct formulation of their concrete, whose remarkable durability appears to be due to the presence of poorly crystalline, calcium-aluminum-silicate-hydrate (C-A-S-H binder) in the cementing matrix of the mortar3, the sequestration of chloride and sulfate ions in discrete crystalline microstructures4, and, as recently identified1, the pervasive crystallization of Al-tobermorite (Figure 2) throughout the fabric of the material, frequently in association with the zeolite, phillipsite (Figure 3). Al-tobermorite is a rare, layered, calcium-silicate hydrate mineral composed of aluminosilicate chains bounded by an interlayer region and a calcium oxide sheet, and it is the widespread presence of tobermorite which prevents cracks from extending through the structure of the concrete, and maintains its integrity over time1. The Romans formed a mortar for their concrete by mixing volcanic ash with quicklime and seawater, and then added fist-sized pieces of volcanic rock to this to act as the "aggregate". Once formed, this combination undergoes a pozzolanic reaction. Pozzolans (named after the city of Pozzuoli, in the Bay of Naples) have been defined5 as materials “which, in themselves, possess little or no cementitious value but which will, in finely divided form and in the presence of water, react chemically with calcium hydroxide [portlandite, Ca(OH)2] to form compounds possessing cementitious properties.” The Romans may have been inspired in arriving at the correct formulation by the naturally cemented volcanic ash deposits which are commonly found in the area, and referred to as (volcanic) “tuff” 6,7.
Such concrete was used in the fabrication of the Pantheon and Trajan's Market, now Museo Fori Imperiali, in Rome in Rome (Figure 4), while massive marine constructions served to shield harbours from the open sea and provided anchoring points for ships and underpinning for warehouses. While Portland cement also contains aggregate in the form of sand and gravel, these components need to be unreactive toward the cement paste components, so that gels do not form, which can cause the concrete to crack, as a result of expansion. Marie Jackson, who is a geologist at the University of Utah is quoted7 as saying that:

"This alkali-silica reaction occurs throughout the world and it's one of the main causes of destruction of Portland cement concrete structures."
In contrast with the case of Portland cement where the inert aggregate particles only cause any cracks to lengthen, in the Roman concrete, mineral inter-growths are formed between the aggregate and the mortar, which prevent them from extending further7.  Aluminous tobermorite (Al-tobermorite) has also been found in ancient Roman cement structures, which is normally formed in lime particles at relatively elevated temperatures. However, it is thought that the material can be formed at much lower temperatures, as a result of seawater percolating through the concrete in seawalls and in piers, dissolving minerals from the volcanic ash and creating a strongly alkaline environment from which Al-tobermorite and phillipsite can crystallize. Significantly, Al-tobermorite forms crystals with platy shapes that interlock to reinforce the cementing matrix and thus increase the concrete's resistance to brittle fracture7.

Reinforced concrete (rebar) has underpinned the massive structures which  characterise the modern world; however, despite having a  far higher tensile strength, its longevity is one to two orders of magnitude less  than that of the concrete used by the Romans. A main reason for this is that when the surrounding concrete cures, oxidation takes place and the reinforcing bars rust over decades, causing sufficient expansion that cracks are formed in the concrete. In contact with seawater, rebar has a life-expectancy of perhaps just 50 years, due to corrosion of the steel, and reactions with calcium hydroxide that cause expansion within the concrete structure8. This vulnerability is absent in Roman concrete, since there is no steel reinforcement in the ancient structures, and furthermore, the volcanic ash mortars are more ductile, and the concrete is reinforced at the structural scale within a conglomeratic rock framework9-11.

Massive harbour structures throughout the Mediterranean region, dating from Roman times, that have been exposed to seawater for two thousand years, are found to contain reactive, alkaline, pumiceous ash aggregate (ranging in size from fine-sand to gravel) commonly with zeolitic surface coatings. However, the nature of those processes that might occur well after the consumption of calcium hydroxide, through pozzolanic reaction with the volcanic ash aggregate, is not at all clear1. This pozzolanic reaction was known to Vitruvius, who noted1 that “latent” heat was released when tuff, pumiceous ash, and lime (CaO) (tofus, pulvis, and calyx) from the Campi Flegrei and Vesuvius volcanic districts “come into one mixture and suddenly take up water and cohere together”. Jackson et al. have reported3 an adiabatic model of exothermic heat being evolved during the hydration of lime and the formation of pozzolanic C-A-S-H binder in a Baianus Sinus breakwater, in the Bay of Pozzuoli, Italy that suggests that temperatures in the range 65–95 °C were maintained for 2–3 years3. In partially dissolved, relict lime clasts, it is likely that this pozzolanic phase of reaction involved crystallization of Al-tobermorite associated with C-A-S-H, a process that was probably complete fairly early on following the building of the concrete marine structures, since it has been shown that  that portlandite [Ca(OH)2] was fully consumed after 5 years of hydration in seawater, in a mock-up of a Roman concrete breakwater11-13.This result is similar to those obtained from other experiments in which concretes with volcanic ash aggregates, in contact with seawater8, were investigated.

Jackson et al.1 used a combination of synchroton-based X-ray microdiffraction) to investigate the textures of zeolite and Al-tobermorite in situ within the Portus Cosanus subaerial pier and the Baianus Sinus and Portus Neronis submarine breakwaters, and Raman spectroscopy to determine the bonding environments in Baianus Sinus Al-tobermorite from various crystallization environments. On this basis, insight is provided into the nature of the low temperature crystallization and stability of phillipsite and Al-tobermorite in alkaline aqueous environments, and how cycling of authigenic minerals [minerals that form in situ within the depositional site by precipitation or recrystallization, instead of being transported from elsewhere (allogenic) by water or wind] occurs over very long service lifetimes, and beneficially, within construction materials that contain natural, volcanic pozzolan.

Using the X-ray synchrotron at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, California, Jackson et al.1 were able to determine the distribution of minerals in samples of Roman harbour concrete. A silicate mineral called phillipsite, which is frequently found in volcanic rocks, was identified, but interestingly, they further observed that crystals of aluminium tobermorite were growing from it. Thus it is concluded that tobermorite had grown from the phillipsite due to the action of seawater washing through the concrete, which increased its degree of alkalinity. Such kinds of crystallization are very unusual events, and indeed are only found in such places as the volcanic island of Surtsey, which is located in the Vestmannaeyjar archipelago off the southern coast of Iceland14. It is thought that, as the tobermorite grows throughout the concrete, it may provide strength to the due to its long, plate-like crystals which allow the material to flex when stressed, and not shatter14. The formation of Al-tobermorite in geologic settings is thought to be a result of hydrothermal processes1: a view that is supported by various laboratory syntheses of the material, although these have all required temperatures in excess of at ≥80 °C 15. However, phillipsite and Al-tobermorite have been documented to form within the pores of a Portland cement paste which was in contact with a claystone interface, one year after installation, and at a lower temperature of 70 °C 16. In addition, examination of a 181 metre core that was drilled-out in 1979, on the volcanic island of Surtsey, showed the pervasive presence of Al-tobermorite, and which spanned a temperature range from 25 °C in surficial deposits to 140 °C in hydrothermally altered tuff17. The significance of the Roman marine mortar system is that it evidences authigenic mineral cycling processes that occur at low temperatures, in which an interplay of different processes, including dissolution and reactions of minerals originally present in volcanic ash, the production of micro-encapsulated alkaline fluids, and the precipitation of new minerals therein, primarily phillipsite, leading on to chemical changes that cause the crystallization of Al-tobermorite crystallization throughout the structure of the concrete. Although it is only though the agency of sophisticated modern analytical methods that the detailed nature of Roman marine concrete technologies are finally being realised, it is clear that the Roman builders intended to produce pozzolanic cementitious systems, whose evolution occurred via the recycling of authigenic minerals, similar to those that occur in geological processes and which could offer a practically geological longevity. Put simply, the Romans designed their marine and other concrete structures to stand the test of time! In contrast with modern rebar concrete based on Portland cement, exposure to seawater causes a “corrosion” that actually strengths the material, and extends its longevity, rather than degrading it, so that it may last for only five decades or so18.




Concrete containing fly ash.

Fly ash is produced by the combustion of coal in power plants, and consists of particles that are sufficiently fine to be carried out with the flue gases. The particles are captured, e.g. using electrostatic separators, before the flue gases reach the chimneys. The exact composition of fly ash depends on the type and origin of the coal-fuel, but the major components are always silicon dioxide (SiO2), aluminium oxide (Al2O3) and calcium oxide (CaO). That fly ash can be used to partially substitute for portland cement in concrete, was discovered as early as 1914, although it was not until 1937 that a significant such use was first demonstrated, and around 15 million tonnes are used annually as a component of concrete19. Due to its broadly similar chemical composition, fly ash has similar (pozzolanic) properties to the volcanic ash that Romans used to make their concrete, which as we have seen, greatly improves the strength and durability of concrete and is a critical factor in the remarkable degree of preservation of buildings and marine structures dating from the time of the Roman Empire1.

There is ongoing research at Ghent University in Belgium, in the use of fly ash to create a kind of concrete which causes cracks to closes up, in a kind of “self-healing” process20. Fly ash is often used to replace up to 30% of the mass of Portland cement, but greater proportions are sometimes used, and there are methods available to permit a 50% degree of substitution. In the construction of the Ghatghar dam project in Maharashtra, India, a 70% replacement level has been attained using processed fly ash, and roller-compacted concrete, a material widely employed in dam-construction21. The workability of cement can be enhanced while using a reduced water-cement ratio, in consequence of the spherical shape of the fly ash particles. The term “Green Concrete” is sometimes applied to concrete that contains fly ash, since it is argued that replacing Portland cement with fly ash reduces the “carbon footprint” of concrete, because there is no new CO2 generated from the fly ash (this has already been produced in the combustion of the coal it is derived from), while the production of each tonne of Portland cement occasions practically one tonne of CO2. In the initial production of the fly ash (i.e. burning coal), around 20 to 30 tonnes of CO2 are produced per tonne of fly ash21. Since the worldwide production of Portland cement was 4.2 billion tons in 2016 22 – a figure that is expected to rise along with the increasing urbanisation of global civilization – if a significant proportion can be substituted for by fly ash, a substantial reduction in the CO2 emissions from the construction industry might be achieved.


Reducing both CO2 emissions and water consumption.
The production of concrete is responsible for around 5% of global CO2 emissions23, and is reckoned by the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), to be the largest source of global carbon dioxide emissions beyond the energy sector. It is the production of clinker [in which a mixture of limestone and clay is sintered, by heating it to around 1,450 oC 24, such that the limestone (CaCO3) is converted to lime (CaO) in situ] that is the major contributor to the overall CO2 emissions from Portland cement manufacture. Since this process consumes a large amount of energy23 (5 GJ per tonne, which is equivalent to about 180 kg of coal), there is a further CO2 burden, and for each tonne of cement that is produced, overall around one tonne of CO2 is released. Since the Romans burned their limestone in a lime kiln, which can be achieved at a lower temperature of 900 oC (1,000 oC is typically used to accelerate the reaction sufficiently)25, the fuel requirements and energy emissions are accordingly less. There are additional CO2 emissions to be accounted for, arising from the need to transport the various component materials, and to mix the cement with gravel, sand, and water, to pour it into the particular structures it is intended to fabricate, and as produced by the various chemical reactions that occur as part of the hardening process for concrete. As an additional factor, large volumes of water are consumed by concrete manufacture23: in total, around 500 litres of water are required to make a cubic metre of concrete, along with the processes of curing, cooling, and cleaning. Thus, the global annual production and application of 4 billion cubic meters of concrete consumes about two cubic kilometers of water, mostly sufficiently pure for drinking. The Romans employed a lower water/cement ratio to make their concrete, which suggest that there is scope for reducing the water demand in global concrete manufacture. Moreover, if seawater could be used in place of drinking water, to produce concrete in coastal regions, where most of the people live across the globe, and using locally available volcanic rocks, considerable savings on both CO2 emissions and water use might be possible.
Paulo Monteiro of the University of Berkley has pointed out that although the Roman concrete exhibits a remarkable durability over very long timescales, it is unlikely to become a wholesale replacement for the construction of many modern buildings, which require the concrete to set more rapidly24. The Berkley group are researching into using volcanic ash as a high volume substitute for fly ash, for use particularly in countries where the amount of available fly ash is limited:

Montario is quoted as saying24: “There is not enough fly ash in this world to replace half of the Portland cement being used. Many countries don’t have fly ash, so the idea is to find alternative, local materials that will work, including the kind of volcanic ash that Romans used. Using these alternatives could replace 40 percent of the world’s demand for Portland cement.”


Potential implications.
Since the production of the Roman type concrete requires lower temperatures, less energy and accordingly smaller carbon dioxide emissions than for the kind of concrete typically used today, clear environmental advantages are offered, along with the fact that it may serve to provide a highly robust and durable material for the fabrication of seawalls and other marine structures. However, Roman concrete hardens more slowly and takes time for the seawater to strengthen it; furthermore, the final material is compressively weaker than Portland cement. Hence, there are limitations to where Roman concrete could be used, and a wholesale substitution is unlikely, e.g, for constructing tall buildings and bridges, although niche applications can be envisaged7. For example, it has been proposed7 that Roman concrete should be used to build the seawall for the Swansea Tidal Lagoon power plant, which is intended to operate for 14 hours per day with a maximum output of 320 MW, enough to power around 155,000 homes. The structure is to be made sufficiently strong to withstand the most destructive of storms - such as occur every 500 years - and to provide a coastline protection against storms and floods2. In order to recoup the costs of building it, the Lagoon would need to generate power for 120 years, by when the reinforced concrete from which it was constructed “would be a mass of corroding steel." 7 In contrast, a structure made from Roman concrete might preserve its integrity for centuries. Clearly the material might also be used to construct other barrage structures for low-carbon energy generation, e.g. the vexed Severn Barrage tidal power station26.

The material also offers the potential to furnish robust defences against sea level rise, which is expected to become a more severe problem, as global temperatures rise. Indeed, sea ice is melting and causing the sea level to rise at triple the pace it did in 1900 27. Although there is an element of uncertainty as to exactly what the sea level will be in the future, it appears that it will be necessary to build barriers to defend coastal cities, in particular seawalls. These serve to prevent cities from being flooded during storms and high tides, and are used around the world to defend vulnerable, coastal locations. Hence, highly durable Roman cement formulations may prove invaluable for the fabrication of such fortifications.


References.
(1) Jackson, M.D., Mulcahy, S.R., Chen, H. et al. (2017) American Minerologist, 102, 1435-1450.
(2) Waters, S., Aggidis, G. (2016): A World First: Swansea Bay Tidal lagoon in review. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 56, 916–921.
(3) Jackson, M.D., Chae, S.R., Mulcahy, S.R. et al. (2013) American Mineralogist, 98, 1669–1687.
(4) Jackson, M.D., Vola, G., Všianský, D. et al. (2012) Cement microstructures and durability in ancient Roman seawater concretes. In J. Válek, C. Groot, and J. Hughes, Eds., Historic Mortars, Characterisation, Assessment and Repair, p. 49–76, Springer, Berlin.
(5) Mehta, P., and Monteiro, P.J.M. (2015) Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, 4th ed. McGraw Hill, New York.
(6) Wikipedia (2017) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuff [Accessed December 11th, 2017].
(7) University of Utah Website (2017), July 3rd. https://unews.utah.edu/roman-concrete/ [Accessed December 11th, 2017]
(8) Massazza, F. (1985) Il Cemento, 82, 26–85.
(9) Brune, P.F., Ingraffea, A.R., Jackson, M.D., and Perucchio, R. (2013) Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 102, 65–76.
(10) Jackson, M.D., Landis, E.N., Brune, P.B. et al. (2014) PNAS, 111, 18485–18489.
(11) Jackson, M.D. (2014) Seawater concretes and their material characteristics. In
J.P. Oleson, Ed., Building for Eternity: the History and Technology of Roman
Concrete Engineering in the Sea, p. 141–187, Oxbow Books, Oxford.
(12) Oleson, J.P., Bottalico, L., Brandon, C., et al (2006) J. Roman Archaeol., 19, 29–52.
(13) Gotti, E., Oleson, J.P., Bottalico, L. et al. (2008) Archaeometry, 50, 576–590.
(14)Witze, A. (2017) Nature News July 3rd. https://www.nature.com/news/seawater-is-the-secret-to-long-lasting-roman-concrete-1.22231. [Accessed December 11th, 2017]
(15) Komarneni, S., and Roy, D. (1983) Science, 221, 647–648.
(16) Lalan, P., Dauzères, A., DeWindt, L. et al (2016) Cement and Concrete Research, 83, 164–178.
(17) Jakobsson, S., and Moore, J.G. (1986) Geological Society of America Bulletin, 97, 648–659.
(18) Dean, A.M. (2017) International Society for Concrete Pavements, October 18th. https://www.concretepavements.org/2017/10/18/rock-solid-history-of-concrete-how-limestone-rocks-and-volcanic-ash-built-the-modern-world/ [Accessed December 11th, 2017].
(20) Snoeck, D., Van Tittelboom, K., Wang, J. et al. (2017) Ghent University Website, https://www.ugent.be/ea/structural-engineering/en/research/magnel/research/research3/selfhealing [Accessed December 11th, 2017].
(21) Wikipedia (2017) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly_ash [Accessed December 11th, 2017]
(22) Statistica (2017) https://www.statista.com/statistics/219343/cement-production-worldwide/ [Accessed December 11th, 2017].
(23) Duplan, N. (2017) Medium, July 22nd.  https://medium.com/@nenoduplan/from-the-foundations-of-rome-to-global-carbon-emissions-reduction-9a2957260566 [Accessed December 11th, 2017].
(24) Yang, S. (2013) Berkley News, http://news.berkeley.edu/2013/06/04/roman-concrete/ [Accessed December 11th 2017].
(25) Wikipedia (2017) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lime_kiln [Accessed DEcember 11th, 2017[.
(26) Wikipedia (2017) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severn_Barrage [Accessed December 11th, 2017].
(27) Dangendorf, S., Marta Marcos, M., Wöppelmann, G. et al. (2017) PNAS, 114, 5946–5951.

Captions to figures.
Figure 1. Portus Cosanus in Orbetello, which reached its commercial peak in the first century BCE, with new berths and facilities for loading and unloading of goods being built. http://wikimapia.org/17830911/it/Antica-Portus-Cosanus#/photo/1396052
Figure 2. Sample of tobermorite from Mexico. Credit: Rob Lavinsky. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/51/Tobermorite-t08-76a.jpg
Figure 3. Complex sample of phillipsite along with Herschelite (large crystal toward top of image) from Mount Etna, Sicily, Italy. Credit: Didier Descouens https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/Herschelite.jpg
Figure 4. Trajan’s Market, in Rome: thought to be the world’s oldest shopping mall. Credit: Zello. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7e/Trajansmarket2.JPG

Sunday, April 01, 2018

Providing Good Nutrition on Home Soil - Back to the Future?


The following makes worthwhile reading in an age which demands feeding a growing global population, while meeting the apparent contradictions to this of planned de-globalisation, and reduced use of fossils. Although the text was originally published in the Science Progress journal, 100 years ago, in reference to feeding the British nation during WWI, it remains highly pertinent in its theme of providing good nutrition on home soil:


"On July 4 this [The Bread and Food Reform] League held a Conference in the Queen's Hall on the National Importance of Utilising Whole Cereals in Time of War, with Sir James Crichton Browne, M.D., D.Sc, F.R.S., in the chair. The Secretary, Miss May Yates, opened the meeting by a few able introductory remarks in which she stated that the League has been in existence for thirty-five years and has made progress to the extent of inducing the Blue Coat Schools, amongst other institutions, to adopt the principle of feeding their children on unadulterated bread — considerably to the improvement of their health.


The Chairman then set himself to prove that the white bread so largely consumed in Britain is both deleterious and wasteful. The millers, in abstracting the outer coating of the grain and resorting to bleaching processes, really remove the health-giving properties of the flour, as it is just this outer covering that contains the vitamines, the germ, and what is technically known as " patents." Nothing more is gained by this bleaching than a pleasing appearance, while the loss in nutrition is considerable. But wheat, he said, is not the only cereal that suffers degeneration at the hands of the millers, for barley and rice also share the same fate.


The tropical disease of beri-beri, he stated, had been proved by men of science to be due to the consumption by the natives of polished rice, and had been largely reduced when coolies were induced to nourish themselves on the unpolished variety. The only cereal that had defied the arts of man was oats, as it was found impossible to remove anything from it owing to its hard and gritty nature ; so that he deplored the fact that oatmeal, in his opinion, largely responsible for the hardiness of the Scottish peasant and the quality of the English racehorse, should be so neglected in England as a human food.


He also denied the truth of the popular ideas that oatmeal is heating and fit only for the poor. Now in time of war, when the general need for economy was felt, it was still more incumbent on the country to insist on the best use being made of its foodstuffs.


If the source of life could be drawn from whole wheat meal, whole wheat flour, oatmeal, unpearled barley and unpolished rice, less meat, eggs, milk and other foods would be needed, thereby effecting a true economy. The only reform possible must come from the Government which had this question already under consideration, and he hoped that a law would be passed to standardise flour and other cereals


Although the rich have the option of making up for the loss of vital properties in the flour by the substitution of other foods, the poor, who live largely on the staff of life, are condemned to buy this deleterious product now on the market, and this League is doing a good work in striving to prove to the poor that their ideas of the value of white bread must be abandoned


The three following resolutions were moved and carried at the meeting :

1. It is resolved that the Government be urged to direct attention to the importance of utilising during war time whole cereals, especially whole wheat meal (100 per cent.) (finely ground), whole wheat flour (about 80 per cent.), containing less indigestible woody fibre, oatmeal, unpearled barley, and unpolished rice, as they retain essential nutritive substances removed from ordinary cereal foods.

Their adoption will reduce the consumption of meat as advised by the Board of Trade and help to promote the healthy economical nourishment of the people. The general use of finely-ground wheat meal would be an increase of over 25 per cent, to the bread supply of the nation in addition to providing a more substantial and nutritious food for the people.

2. It is resolved that the Government be asked to take measures to prevent the abstraction, without notification to the public, from whole meal, wheat meal, and household flour of the germ of wheat and of the strong gluten found in flours commercially designated " patents," and also to prevent the sale, without notification to the public, of flour which has been bleached, "improved" or otherwise adulterated.

3. It is resolved that these resolutions be sent to the Prime Minister, the Presidents of the Local Government Board, the Board of Agriculture, the Board of Trade, the Board of Education, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, and the National War Savings Committee, appealing to them to lead public opinion to recognise the importance of this subject ; and that education authorities all over the country and women's societies be asked to co-operate in this educational campaign and thus help their country in this time of national need.

Dr. S. Rideal, F.I.C., J. P., in moving the third resolution, gave a valuable piece of information when he showed up the fact that our only statute regulating the sale of good bread was formulated as far back as 1836, and that, although this Act stated of what ingredients bread might consist, it made no provision whatever for the punishment of any persons who might use these ingredients in an adulterated form."


Originally published in Science Progress  v11. (1916-1917) p139. In the modern context, the related subjects of The Right to Food and the Planetary Boundaries Framework and The Imperative for Regenerative Agriculture were addressed in a centenary version of the journal, which was produced in order to survey "progress" in a number of areas that were of concern 100 years ago, some of which remain pertinent.






Sunday, February 11, 2018

Burn Out: The Endgame for Fossil Fuels. Dieter Helm.

Published in the journal, Science Progress  Volume 100 Number 4 2017


Book review
Burn Out: The Endgame for Fossil Fuels.
DIETER HELM.
Yale University Press 2017
ISBN 9780300225624; xx + 281 pp; £16.59

Ironically, given its theme, as published early in 2017, “Burn Out: The Endgame for Fossil Fuels” shortly preceded the announcement made by President Trump of the withdrawal by the United States from the Paris Agreement on climate change, driven primarily by an aim to support the US coal industry, which he maintains has been hampered by environmental policies, and disadvantaged in comparison with other countries, such as China. The book’s title offers  a punchy proclamation, that the age of fossil fuels is coming to an end:  this is not as a result of any imminent shortage of them - far from it - but an expectation that natural gas will be employed as a cheap and plentiful bridging fuel,  en route to a dominant electrification of the energy sector, most likely powered by advanced solar technologies, and that such innovations as the Internet of Things (IoT), 3D printing, and robotics will confer a more efficient overall use of energy, hence reducing demand on oil, gas and ultimately renewables.

The author, Dieter Helm, is professor of energy policy at Oxford University, and an outspoken commentator and critic on global energy strategies, including those intended to ameliorate climate change. Thus, this book is in part a consolidation of some views, framed from the viewpoint of an economist, espoused in his various writings on the subject, and an extension of some of the themes covered in his previous books. Helm remains thoroughly censorious of the peak oil concept, and bangs the drum that “peak-oilers” have got it wrong. He stresses that there is no shortage of “oil” (or indeed of the other fossil fuels), and in terms of the large quantities of carbon-rich fossil materials that lie in the ground he is quite correct. However, peak oil was never a reference to “running out of oil”, but to an ultimate maximum in the rate of production and flow of this unique source of energy into global civilization. This depends on geological factors,  changes in technology and the oil price, and indeed, the “hole” in supply that would have arisen following the peaking in global production of conventional oil that  occurred about a decade ago, has since been filled by production from expensive and more energy intensive “unconventional” sources, mainly from hydraulically fracturing (“fracking”) shale and processing bitumen from oil sands, neither of which would have been entertained had the oil price not approached and then exceeded $100 a barrel.

As Helm has stressed, it was surging demand from China for oil that initially forced the price up; however, the resulting escalation in unconventional production, combined with a maintained strong output by OPEC (30% of this from Saudi Arabia), led to an oversupply against demand and a price crash. Helm asserts that the oil price will stay low (perhaps in the range $40-$60) from now on, but the question remains of, how low can the price go and oil production still remain  a viable activity? There are varying estimates of the breakeven price for oil from different plays, depending on exactly what is being measured, and it is claimed that due to improved technology, oil might be viable even at $30 a barrel. However, some analysts in the oil industry have concluded that the relatively low apparent breakeven prices currently being quoted for shale are partly an artefact of not including all costs, and that service providers, e.g. fracking crews, are running on the margins, accepting whatever cash flow they can get in order to remain in business. Indeed, many small oil and gas companies have gone bankrupt in their efforts to continue shale gas and oil production, while oil and gas prices plummeted.

Whatever may be quibbled over the cost/price of oil in $, an important measure of production viability is Energy Returned on Energy Invested (EROEI) – sometimes the equivalent term, Energy Returned on Investment (EROI) is used - since it takes energy to produce energy, and ultimately it is primary input energy that is the determining factor in the production rate of a resource (i.e. physics trumps economics). In the limit, for an EROEI of 1, it takes as much energy to produce the resource as will be delivered by burning it: clearly a pointless exercise. Before 1930, the figure was around 100, as it still is in some plays in Saudi Arabia, while the global average has fallen to below 20.  An increasing reliance on unconventional oil - i.e. “tight oil” produced by fracking shale, extra-heavy oil/bitumen from oil sands, (ultra)deepwater drilling, etc. - means falling EROEI (perhaps 5 for some shale and oil sands deposits), higher production costs, greater  carbon emissions, and less available energy for society from the total primary energy that is accessible, if more of that energy is consumed overall by the various energy production processes. As noted, it was only the very high oil price that prevailed prior to its crash in 2014, which rendered alternative, unconventional sources economically viable. In the present period of low oil prices, the high costs of producing oil from these sources continue to push companies to the verge of bankruptcy, and investment in new projects  is stalling. On this basis, it is not obvious how cheap oil prices will be maintained into the future.

In regard to the potential for producing the large quantities of natural gas that have been estimated to exist  in shale plays across the world,   echoing the notable  success  achieved  in the United States, the experience of Poland1  might urge some caution.  Originally reckoned in a US Department of Energy study to be the European giant, with holdings of around 5,295 billion cubic metres (bcm) of technically recoverable shale gas, the figure was revised down initially to 346–768 bcm by the Polish Geological Institute, which nose-dived further to perhaps 38 bcm, according to a study made by the US Geological Survey, i.e. around one hundredth or so of the original estimate, and with a huge range of uncertainty: anywhere between zero and 116 bcm. Of the 72 test wells that had been drilled in Poland by the end of 2015, 25 were successfully fracked, but none of them yielded a sufficient gas production rate to be commercially profitable. It may well prove that technical advances, such as using supercritical CO2 as the fracking fluid, will improve the circumstances  in Poland and elsewhere with  complex geologies, e.g. China (where, reportedly, shale gas accounted for around 5% of total domestic natural gas production in 2016), but unless the selling price of gas increases, or somehow production costs can be substantially reduced, the prospects for a global shale gas bonanza are open to question. In any case, while gas is clearly the better option to coal, since it produces perhaps half of the latter’s carbon emissions per unit of energy generated, unless the “bridge” that it is intended to build is a relatively short one, it may not fulfil the carbon reductions outlined in the Paris Agreement, and it is debatable that even these are sufficient to keep the mean global temperature from rising in excess of the 2 oC limit, beyond which catastrophic climate change is predicted to ensue.

Clearly, we need low-carbon energy sources as soon as possible, and Helm is sceptical about the prospects for both wind and nuclear energy, concluding that the primary energy source in a largely electrified system will be “probably solar, but not as we know it”, which implies a reliance on new and untried technology whose date and scale of installation is as yet unknown. Indeed, to change to a nearly “all electric” energy system would entail the installation of an entirely new distribution network, of much greater capacity than we have presently, and most likely of the smart grid kind, with the potential for energy savings, both in terms of primary (input) and end-use energy, although questions remain about how base-load power would be provided, which would require storage (battery technology) if solar is to be a key driver in the scheme.

Helm concludes that sustained low oil prices will severely damage the economies of oil exporting nations. For example, although Saudi Arabia can produce oil for $5-$10 a barrel, it needs a selling price of nearer $100 to cover its national expenditure (fiscal breakeven price). He opines that the strife in the Middle East will worsen, as nations who earn most of their GDP from selling oil find themselves lacking the funds to pay for social programmes which help to preserve societal order. Helm predicts that the future for Russia, which previously benefitted from high oil and gas prices, “looks bleak, since it has few competitive industries beyond fossil fuels, other than its military complex”. While China is lambasted for having attained prominence as the world’s worst “emitter”, its firm stance on decarbonising its use of energy is applauded. Helm concludes that the US is “The lucky country” in terms of its energy prospects, while in Europe, the situation is “Not as bad as it seems”.

In summary, this is a well written and thought provoking book, and is impressive in its wide ranging coverage of those technical, economic and geopolitical factors which are woven together in the Gordian knot of providing a sustainable energy supply, while dealing with climate change. In truth, we are in uncharted territory regarding our use of energy and other resources, but Burn Out offers considerable insight into the complexity of the challenges that may lie ahead of us, and outlines some courses of action that we might take in dealing with them. In Helm’s view, “step one is to acknowledge the possibility of radical change and of discontinuity.” The existing patterns of supply and demand for energy, upon which the world’s geopolitics is based, may change profoundly, and it is a mistake to assume that tomorrow will be “roughly like today”.

Reference.
(1) Inman, M. (2016) Nature, 531, 22-24.